InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that doesn’t try to hose its users for money.
It is currently Sat May 24, 2025 12:39 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Kitsap County in pursuit of stolen Honda. End up in the area of Sedgwick and Bethel.

WSP plane doing emphasis at Sedgwick and the Hwy16 the whole time.

WSP plane never heard about it till to late. They keep talking about each other and trying to communicate through their dispatchers but cannont talk to each other direct.


Go to freaking LERN!

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:15 pm
Posts: 1654
Location: Destination Unknown
You could promote an educational program like "Learn LERN!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 2:32 pm
Posts: 144
Location: FB2 Simulcast
Alas, this is a common ailment among many Public Safety Agencies. This void has been most noticeable across jurisdictional boundaries - county / state or federal agencies. We emphatically train and practice the IMS system, and Blue Card, and the NFA Order Model, but many of us operate within entirely different radio system formats.

P25 was one such interoperability idea, . . . but it still so common to see vast differences in radio formats and spectrum bands between neighboring jurisdictions. Don't get me wrong here, . . . P25 has it's own system design challenges to overcome too. But that's a different $$$ topic for another day.

Operationally, unless there is a champion within the individual agency field ranks to further the interoperability causes, such planning efforts often are overlooked. Sadly, most field personnel and many Public Safety administrators don't fully understand radio anyway. The troops need to embrace the fact that radio equipment can truly save your life - if you honestly know how to use it. What is the one single tool that all Public Safety personnel use everyday, on every shift ? The radio.

However, if you were to place the various system techs in room and tell them to make it work, they'd have it figured out in about 30 minutes because that's what techs do. But techs of course work for radio system administrators - who develop and carry out their agency rules - both according to budget priorities, customer desires, and risk management needs.

The reality is that Public Safety agency administrators have greater concerns to worry about. Budgets administratively rule the day. That's the hard truth. And Public Safety funding ( local tax revenues ) are designed to be very geo-specific. It is not a popular practice to use local tax funding to further enhance or invest in a neighboring ( disparate ) radio system.

Thankfully, we are now encouraged with the recent advent of I.P in the radio world over the last decade - as that level of connectivity opens up huge possibilities for dispatcher console activated inter-connectivity / patching possibilities.

Without dedicated funding and some strong state administrative WAC code language I fear that this process could continue to falter and further drift as radios systems continue to evolve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:17 pm 
Offline
Mr. Bad Example
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:11 am
Posts: 8079
Location: Nancy's Bedroom... ooh aah
Craig H wrote:
Operationally, unless there is a champion within the individual agency field ranks to further the interoperability causes, such planning efforts often are overlooked. Sadly, most field personnel and many Public Safety administrators don't fully understand radio anyway.

One of the issues I see with that is the vast amount of 'other' stuff one needs to understand...Statutes, administrative codes, court rules, the latest legal bulletins, bail schedules, geography, agency rules-policies-procedures, jurisdictional (City/County/Etc) ordinances and regs, firearms, driving, wanted persons/warrant lists, etc etc. Some stuff gets left behind.
Quote:
However, if you were to place the various system techs in a bar

Fixed.

_________________
President-in-Exile, Seattle Area Radio Communications And Scanner Traffic Intercept Crew (SARCASTIC)
Don't feel bad if you can't use your STD100/200; there are still people using Digital Frequency Search!
Bunnery definition for the under-fives


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Quote:
However, if you were to place the various system techs in a bar

Fixed.[/quote]

My calendar is open!

But withstanding the legalese- When in doubt.. go to LERN! (if its open for use) or did I read that in their SOP wrong??

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:14 pm 
Offline
Bringer of Light
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 1573
Location: Depends on the day of the week
I'm glad this happens in areas with multi-million dollar systems in place, too.

_________________
Interoperability is an attitude, not a technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:37 pm 
Offline
Mr. Bad Example
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:11 am
Posts: 8079
Location: Nancy's Bedroom... ooh aah
A- Kitsap County has a multi-million dollar radio system?

B- Doesn't Moses Hole run a fully encrypted 800mhz Tait system? How's interoperability there in VHF land?

C- Interoperability is a mindset, despite what is said on my monthly NPSTC conference calls.

_________________
President-in-Exile, Seattle Area Radio Communications And Scanner Traffic Intercept Crew (SARCASTIC)
Don't feel bad if you can't use your STD100/200; there are still people using Digital Frequency Search!
Bunnery definition for the under-fives


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Wilrobnson wrote:
A- Kitsap County has a multi-million dollar radio system?

B- Doesn't Moses Hole run a fully encrypted 800mhz Tait system? How's interoperability there in VHF land?

C- Interoperability is a mindset, despite what is said on my monthly NPSTC conference calls.



A. yes- They originally spent just over 10 million but that went up a little as they added a couple of sites.

C. Its a mindset that needs to be beaten into a few people before the Motorola, Kenwood, Harris, (ect) sales people get to them.

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:31 am 
Offline
Mr. Bad Example
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:11 am
Posts: 8079
Location: Nancy's Bedroom... ooh aah
I don't know...I know of a local government that went Harris. The rep suggested a bank of interop talkgroups for roaming to/working with users of the statewide trunked system. The local government policy makers gave that idea an emphatic NO. They even vetoed the handful of statewide simplex interops freqs, thus screwing end users yet again.

I do know, from my own experience, that attempting to find and switch to another radio channel during a high-speed pursuit is not easily accomplished. A good dispatcher could patch and/or regroup(?) the radio users involved, but that would require training for a rare event. Diversity training is more important to admin.

_________________
President-in-Exile, Seattle Area Radio Communications And Scanner Traffic Intercept Crew (SARCASTIC)
Don't feel bad if you can't use your STD100/200; there are still people using Digital Frequency Search!
Bunnery definition for the under-fives


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Wilrobnson wrote:
The local government policy makers gave that idea an emphatic NO. They even vetoed the handful of statewide simplex interops freqs, thus screwing end users yet again.

I do know, from my own experience, that attempting to find and switch to another radio channel during a high-speed pursuit is not easily accomplished. A good dispatcher could patch and/or regroup(?) the radio users involved, but that would require training for a rare event. Diversity training is more important to admin.


chpalmer wrote:
C. Its a mindset that needs to be beaten into a few people


One of the bigger problems with patches is that it still takes the bulk of the signal away from the incident and places it further away. One big idea about interops is that they should keep the radios RF close by so that all those at the scene can definitely hear whats going on. When this traffic is repeated there is always the chance that the local high rf from the mobiles will desense the others right up close and make reception of the further out base stations very difficult. Out of band interop is not that big of an issue. But say patching one VHF to another..

Single button channel on the face of the radio can help in this situation. "Primary" "Car4" "State" "LERN" < like that across the face.

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 1863
Here you go


Attachments:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg [ 50.92 KiB | Viewed 4927 times ]

_________________
"I was installing un-programmed radios"
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:46 pm 
Offline
Bringer of Light
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 1573
Location: Depends on the day of the week
Wilrobnson wrote:

B- Doesn't Moses Hole run a fully encrypted 800mhz Tait system? How's interoperability there in VHF land?



Yes. Yes they do. And in fact, I'm still selling and installing VHF radios in fire rigs especially after these past few weeks, they've all found out they can't talk to shit, even in their own county. A lot of "Go to 800 R/R A1!"

Edit: Law stuff encrypted only. Fire stuff in the clear. Even Fire can't listen to Law in their own county.

_________________
Interoperability is an attitude, not a technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:24 pm
Posts: 325
jrw14493 wrote:
Edit: Law stuff encrypted only. Fire stuff in the clear. Even Fire can't listen to Law in their own county.


Kinda reminds me how the DOD wouldn't let the Coast Guard have the encryption keys for non Selective Availability GPS signals. Although the CG defeated S/A by developing DGPS in 1996, Bill Clinton turned off S/A in 2000. Your tax dollars hard at work...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 2:32 pm
Posts: 144
Location: FB2 Simulcast
Well, then there is always this:

http://onenet.wa.gov/siec-state-interoperability-executive-committee/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com