Wilrobnson wrote:
Doesn't matter if I'm mobile using the NMO with the antenna of the day, or stationary with a duckie.
Ive never seen a scanner with an antenna that would do 900 well at all.
900 is very directional. 900 attenuation can be very extreme under certain conditions and is very easy to simulcast because of this. My first system was a 900 mhz trunking system off of Santiago Peak in California over Corona. San Diego to Sylmar coverage on my installs but
allot less on the installs done by other contractors using rg58 and really bad when the contractor tried to use a cell antenna (because it had low reflected power on rg58) on their installs. :roll:
I used a B8963 antenna and 8X (or equivalent loss) cable on any 900 install I did up until we sold our 900 license. On the repeater side we used 1-5/8" to the antenna 60 feet up.
System worked very well but like I said- we saw the signal go down +20dB just passing a grove of trees.
My guess is that they (Tacoma Power) are trying to use smaller heliax and make up the loss with extreme high gain antennas (which can have their own bad characteristics).
System engineers need to take their advertised antenna patterns more seriously.