Attachment:
dt160816.gif [ 112.06 KiB | Viewed 5952 times ]
There ya go!
| InterceptRadio.com Forums http://www.interceptradio.com/bbs/ |
|
| WSP Performance Audit http://www.interceptradio.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8565 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | cparris2 [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | WSP Performance Audit |
The Washington State Auditor's Office has released a Performance Audit of the WSP Narrowbanding Project: http://www.sao.wa.gov/state/Pages/PerformanceAudit.aspx http://www.sao.wa.gov/state/Documents/P ... 015481.pdf - Chris |
|
| Author: | chpalmer [ Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Thanks for the links Chris! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBgeCZW3upg |
|
| Author: | Jim [ Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
cparris2 wrote: The Washington State Auditor's Office has released a Performance Audit of the WSP Narrowbanding Project: http://www.sao.wa.gov/state/Pages/PerformanceAudit.aspx http://www.sao.wa.gov/state/Documents/P ... 015481.pdf - Chris Correction for the pdf page Should read Blaine, LYNDEN & Sumas on page 10 talking about IWN. FERNDALE is still on the Whatcom County Sheriff system. |
|
| Author: | freqseeker [ Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | WSP Tacoma |
I am receiving WSP Tacoma 155.520 P25 NAC D10 as I type. They were analog last night. Vince. |
|
| Author: | TechnoWeenie [ Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Tacoma |
freqseeker wrote: I am receiving WSP Tacoma 155.520 P25 NAC D10 as I type. They were analog last night. Vince. They're on the TRS as well.. E6E6.. |
|
| Author: | icom1020 [ Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
have to admit, Im sitting in Tumwater with a astro saber and I'm picking up Tacoma mobile traffic better than expected. P25 is strange indeed, mobile is at mp 137, a good 20 plus miles away. another unit heard was at narrows bridge. Is it possible the conventional is rebroadcasting the 700 system?. |
|
| Author: | TechnoWeenie [ Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
icom1020 wrote: have to admit, Im sitting in Tumwater with a astro saber and I'm picking up Tacoma mobile traffic better than expected. P25 is strange indeed, mobile is at mp 137, a good 20 plus miles away. another unit heard was at narrows bridge. Is it possible the conventional is rebroadcasting the 700 system?. It is. It's multicast. Both IWN and 700 get dumped to area channel, P25.. |
|
| Author: | icom1020 [ Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Do they keep the newer 700 WSP TGs in phase one for awhile? I'm noticing Tacoma is but Bremerton is gone from Capitol Pk in Phase 1. |
|
| Author: | jrw14493 [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Quote: Although not necessary to meet current federal narrowbanding requirements, under Washington state law, any agency that purchased radios aft er 2006 (with the exception of the 2011-2013 biennium) must comply with the Project 25 (P25) interoperability standard. WAC? RCW? |
|
| Author: | jrw14493 [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
jrw14493 wrote: Quote: Although not necessary to meet current federal narrowbanding requirements, under Washington state law, any agency that purchased radios aft er 2006 (with the exception of the 2011-2013 biennium) must comply with the Project 25 (P25) interoperability standard. WAC? RCW? 43.105.330 |
|
| Author: | Atomic Taco [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
jrw14493 wrote: jrw14493 wrote: Quote: Although not necessary to meet current federal narrowbanding requirements, under Washington state law, any agency that purchased radios aft er 2006 (with the exception of the 2011-2013 biennium) must comply with the Project 25 (P25) interoperability standard. WAC? RCW?http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/dispo.aspx?cite=43.105 |
|
| Author: | chpalmer [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
http://law.justia.com/codes/washington/ ... 3.105.331/ Even though there is no (that I nor the local techs know of) UHF P-25 system in the state, the patrol is still forced by state law to purchase P-25 capable radios to interop with those agencies on UHF. Or more correctly- (iii) Any new system or equipment purchases shall be, at a minimum, upgradable to project-25; |
|
| Author: | Craig H [ Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Well, lest we not forget forget the D.O.D. P25 UHF System. I can hear a good deal of analog voice from both N.A.S. Whidbey and Kitsap. Mostly maintenance crews, but occasionally I can hear Base Security and some Fire Units in the clear. And I also understand that they've recently upgraded to APX7000 dual-band stuff for mutual / automatic aid operations. A more descriptive term for P25 might look like more this: P$2$5. |
|
| Author: | N7QOR [ Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Atomic Taco wrote: jrw14493 wrote: jrw14493 wrote: Quote: Although not necessary to meet current federal narrowbanding requirements, under Washington state law, any agency that purchased radios aft er 2006 (with the exception of the 2011-2013 biennium) must comply with the Project 25 (P25) interoperability standard. WAC? RCW?http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/dispo.aspx?cite=43.105 Apparently twice It's listed as repealed 2011 and again 2015 Wanted to make damn sure huh? |
|
| Author: | chpalmer [ Wed Aug 17, 2016 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: WSP Performance Audit |
Attachment: dt160816.gif [ 112.06 KiB | Viewed 5952 times ] There ya go! |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com |
|