InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that puts military & officer safety ahead of profits.
It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 10:12 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Output > ERP
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:58 pm
Posts: 3429
Location: Not in Alaska
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSear ... ey=3301972

Definitely not the first time I've seen the output power greater than the ERP. Are they assuming almost a 50% loss between the repeater and the antenna!?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Output > ERP
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:15 pm
Posts: 1654
Location: Destination Unknown
Atomic Taco wrote:
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseFreqSum.jsp?licKey=3301972

Definitely not the first time I've seen the output power greater than the ERP. Are they assuming almost a 50% loss between the repeater and the antenna!?


Assuming, or perhaps actually calculating

There are many reasons that an outcome like this could occur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Output > ERP
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:17 am
Posts: 2643
Location: Not Gulfport
Atomic Taco wrote:
Definitely not the first time I've seen the output power greater than the ERP. Are they assuming almost a 50% loss between the repeater and the antenna!?


Nah the 40w value just refers to the output power of the transmitter -- that the frequency is assigned to. The 2nd value (Max ERP) just refers to what the FCC is "certifying" them to use. So they must comply with that. Ideally, if the system were designed efficiently, then you'd have 40w transmitter probably reduced to only 10w into low-loss coax but a high-gain, roof-mounted antenna. This would save energy and allow for future expansion. (Of course, it's usually 40w into cheap antenna and cheap coax == high loss == 25w ERP...)

Technically, the station is supposed to be under the 25w ERP no matter what (and they can be fined if they're not) but it's not like the FCC has the man-power to check every transmitting station. Usually it would be a secondary violation. i.e. if they're at full 40w of power and ERP is more like 80w ... and they're stomping on Joe Blow Towing... then they could get cited for causing interference and using above their allowable transmitting power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Output > ERP
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:11 pm
Posts: 2151
Location: Puget Sound
Ive got a single antenna combiner system with 4 repeaters connected to it at a customers location. Receive Transmit on same antenna.

The repeaters can transmit at 45watts and are turned down to 40. The loss through the combiner is enough (due to the design) that I get 6watts per channel on the output. With a 6dB antenna and no loss in the feedline Id only have 24watts ERP. But calculating the 1.2dB of loss of the feedline Im more around 18watts ERP.

Truthfully the "Power Out" on an application and license are largely ignored by the FCC these days. They really want to know and control the "ERP". (told that by an FCC engineer)

_________________
"A well regulated breakfast, being necessary to the healthy start of the day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com