InterceptRadio.com Forums

The radio website that respects the Civil Air Patrol and their copyrights.
It is currently Mon Jun 02, 2025 5:52 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Forums       Map Search       Database Search       Live Audio       Alerts       Wiki




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Larsen FB Series Antenna
PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 1:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:02 pm
Posts: 88
Anyone have an old Larsen catalog from the 90's? I found 3 new Larsen FB2 5T 800 Whip Assembly antennas in the packages at Goodwill for $1.29 each. As far as I can tell they are 865-965 mhz, fixed base ants according to the instruction sheet. The instruction sheet lists a FB0002 ant., so I think that's what I have?????

Date of manufacture lists 11/25/98 Has a female N connector and 4 tiny radials. I'll have to make a L bracket for it, but that's no big deal. I don't have N fittings/coax as I'm from HF world, so I was thinking I'd be fine with ordering a UHF female-N male adapter and going with that. At 800 plus mhz, would it be better to go with N connectors or not worry about it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 6:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 830
Get good coax, and pick the adapters after that. RG-6 would work for scanning - might have to look a bit for adapters, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 8:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 75
If at all possible use the real N connector.
I have checked many adapters and a lot of them are quite lossy.
For example some of the cheap UHF to Mini-uhf were more than 4 dB of loss.
If you really have lots of signal ( like you are near the systems you want to listen to ) it might not be a problem.
But if you have any system that is weak, the crappy adapters some people sell may put you out of coverage.
It seems to me you could get an N-male for RG-8X ( that size ) to fit on RG-6.
Or better yet, just use 8X and correct connectors at each end.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 23, 2011 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:06 am
Posts: 344
I tend to agree with all said before. PROPERLY install the N connector to the cable as a flaky job there can insert more loss than most of the crappy N-UHF adapters out there.

Believe it-- Motorola actually built 800 Mhz radios which were equipped with UHF fittings, the logic being as 800 at the time was "new" that most of the radio installers of the era had no clue as to how to properly install a type N fitting, and felt that a properly installed "UHF" fitting would be "better" than a botched installation of a decent connector :nobs:


With the exception of 75 ohm N fittings (Yes-- these exist and I have a LIMITED supply:) not many are designed to "properly" mate with RG-6...

However, one could possibly substitute a 50 ohm center pin and "make it fit"...

Collecting "leftovers" from paging/cellular buildouts and removal work means I have an intriguing collection of VHF thru microwave goodies in my junque box :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:

Make lots of noise if you are unable to find something that works...

Eric
KB7DQH

_________________
That is how the people at DARPA think. they take things and use them in unconventional ways, to see what happens.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by electricity. Copyright © 2013 Interceptradio.com